Unwelcome
Why is the Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil deportation case being twisted into a challenge to free speech? It’s a simple case of an alien obtaining a visa by fraud. He answered falsely that he would not provide support to a terrorist organization. He was in the forefront of the “Anti- Israel/we love Hamas” protests that have rocked that campus. His anti-sematic hate speech and targeting Jewish students has no place in this country.
Had this lying Syrian answered truthfully, his visa and subsequent Green Card would never have been issued. Defrauding the US Immigration Authority is a classic, simple and non-controversial basis to revoke US residency of an alien. This is why Mahmoud is being broomed out of the United States. But a partisan, activist judiciary is attempting to assign citizen “rights” to a guest of this Nation.
What the country is witnessing, is a renewal of the “Lawfare” that was personally conducted against candidate Trump, now revived to attack his Administration without regard to common sense. This hatred of the President is absurd. Closing the borders and throwing out the those who commit hate crimes and criminal illegals is one of the major reasons the Republicans prevailed in November. That and the fact the Democrats ran Kamala, their “seventh string candidate”, as James Carville is fond of opining.
This begs the question, why in the world would any judge want to halt the expulsions of provable, violent criminals? Sending these gangsters to a prison in El Salvador, who entered the country illegally from Venezuela, sponsored by the corrupt Madero regime is perfectly logical. Yet a judge whose daughter is an attorney for an organization that represents illegals, has deemed this to be a violation of their rights. Huh? No conflict of interest there…right?
Trump said that the judge “was not elected President” and called for him to be impeached. He posted the following on Truth Social, “We don’t want vicious, violent, and demented criminals, many of them deranged murderers, in our country.”
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare public statement on March 18, appearing to criticize President Donald Trump’s call to impeach a federal judge who blocked the President’s proclamation seeking to deport members of a Venezuelan gang. “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
Also unwelcome in the military are transgender members. The outrage from the Left is deafening. How can Trump mandate through an executive order such a heartless, discriminatory policy and Defense Secretary Hegseth endorse it? The progressive leftists’ judge shopped, and found Federal District Judge Ana C. Reyes of the DC Court, appointed by Joe Biden in 2023. She is the first openly gay Federal Judge and has a long history of LGBTQ+ activism. She has made substantial contributions to the Democrat party. Hardly an unbiased individual. She has no business ruling on how this Nation’s military selects its members.
Someone needs to tell radical, looney Judge Reyes that the military is not an equal opportunity employer. You can’t be in military service if you are too fat, tall, short, skinny, have poor eyesight, or hearing. If you’re in a wheelchair, dumb as a rock, can’t meet the physical requirements of an obstacle course or test for physiological issues, you are not in the military. You either meet the set requirement of the military or you don’t. Our Nation’s armed forces are trained to eliminate the enemy and destroy their stuff. Commanders don’t have time to coddle or accommodate distractions like a male soldier who thinks he’s a gal. Those who have served know that a transgender service member is a massive distraction to mission accomplishment. Judge Reyes has never served, and is clearly clueless. The military is not a democracy by any stretch.
Judicial overreach has become a cancer in our system. The Nation cannot have unelected judges blocking policies the American people voted for. The Swamp is weaponizing courts to paralyze elected leaders while its bureaucrats operate unchecked. Elections are supposed to decide policy. Not judges. Not unelected lawyers. Not lawsuits bankrolled by activist billionaires like George Soros.
The President of the United States commands the military, enforces immigration law, and executes policy because the American people put him there. But if every major decision is overridden by a single judge in a random district court, who’s really in charge, the voters or activists’ lawyers initiating partisan lawsuits?
President Thomas Jefferson wrote that making judges the ultimate deciders of law would “place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.” If this judicial lawfare initiated by appointed Leftist bench warmers continues, then sadly Jefferson may be right.
A system where power is transferred from elected officials to unelected judges isn’t a democracy.
It’s a coup in slow motion…that’s unwelcome.